1997
Land Rover Range Rover

Starts at:
$55,500
Shop options
New 1997 Land Rover Range Rover
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 4dr Wgn SE 108" WB
    Starts at
    $55,500
    13 City / 17 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4dr Wgn HSE 108" WB
    Starts at
    $63,000
    12 City / 16 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 1997 Land Rover Range Rover review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

The dearth of lions and tigers not withstanding, driving a Range Rover 4.6 HSE or a Range Rover 4.0 SE throughout the wilds of Indiana can be a trip.

As sport-utility vehicles of the British Rover Group, these upstream 1997 sport utes put extra emphasis on the sport and utility aspects of the SUV market, combining life on the trail with life in the luxury lane.

Represented locally by Tom Wood Range Rover, the 4.6 HSE and 4.0 SE models are designated by the displacement of their V-8 engines.

In keeping with the luxury theme, the vehicles have a car-like ride to go with their utility capabilities. In Indiana, their use falls more to a daily commute rather than tracking the wild beasts. Occupants are coddled amidst the trapping of leather, burled walnut trim and a plethora of comfort and convenience accessories.

Both the 4.0 and the performance-oriented 4.6 have no trouble qualifying for a luxury category. The MSRP (manufacturer’s suggested retail price) for the 4.0 is $55,500. For the 4.6, it’s $63,000. Add to those figures $625 for freight.

In return, you get a lot of vehicle.

It’s about as strong as a bridge and features a fully boxed and welded frame with an internal “Z” reinforcement that provides a rigid base. A Class III tow-hitch receiver is integrated with the frame. Ten tuned body mounts isolate noise and vibration from the passenger compartment.

Front and rear axles for the four-wheel drive system are full-floating live (solid housing) axles for maximum strength. This is the basic axle structure of a truck, but the car-like ride is achieved via an electronic air suspension system with air springs, tuned shock absorbers and height sensors at each wheel.

The air suspension provides 5.2 inches of travel over five height modes. There is an access mode for ease of entrance and exit, a low profile for highway cruising, standard ride height, high profile for the trail and an extended profile when the vehicle automatically senses the need for high centering.

Obviously, if you drive the sport utes across a gully, it’s not going to ride as if it’s going down North Meridian Street – on second thought, there isn’t be too much difference – but the air system is designed to smooth out the bumps and vibrations of normal travel.

Power is by state-of-the-art aluminum alloy V-8s that utilize a push rod/rocker arm valve train. Horsepower and torque figures follow known parameters, with the larger 4.6-liter engine putting out more power than the 4.0-liter motor.

The 4.6 possesses 278-cubic inches of displacement and produces a healthy 235-horsepower and 280 foot-pounds of torque. The 241-cubic inch 4.0 comes in at 190-horsepower and 236 foot-pounds of torque.

Both engines are real stump pullers, being rated at 7,700 pounds of towing capacity in the low range, 6,500 pounds in the high range.

The only transmission offered is a ZF four-speed automatic, with its electronically controlled high/low gear ratio range selected by a single tr ansmission lever.

An interesting design feature is a transfer case for the four-wheel drive system has an emergency/parking brake drum mounted on its side. In this location, the drum will not fill with mud and debris as wheel mounted drums do.

Despite the differences in engine size, there is a miniscule difference in fuel consumption. The bigger engine takes more, of course, but only by 1 mile per gallon.

The 4.0 is rated at 13 mpg city/17 highway. For the 4.6, its 12/16.

Admittedly, the 4.6 is a high buck proposition, but in addition to a bigger engine, it rides on bigger wheels that sharpen the off-road response.

The wheels are 18-inch “Mondial” design alloys that have a rim width of 8 inches, compared to a 16-inch wheel for the 4.0 SE. These 18-inchers can churn up a monstrous amount mud whether goings through bottom lands or up the side of the mountain.

I guess you could say the Range Rover 4.6 HSE and Range Rover SE are quintessential sport-utilityvehicles that o ffer image as well as utilitarian practicality. They also provide a new philosophy to the sport ute market.

1997 Land Rover Range Rover review: Our expert's take
By

The dearth of lions and tigers not withstanding, driving a Range Rover 4.6 HSE or a Range Rover 4.0 SE throughout the wilds of Indiana can be a trip.

As sport-utility vehicles of the British Rover Group, these upstream 1997 sport utes put extra emphasis on the sport and utility aspects of the SUV market, combining life on the trail with life in the luxury lane.

Represented locally by Tom Wood Range Rover, the 4.6 HSE and 4.0 SE models are designated by the displacement of their V-8 engines.

In keeping with the luxury theme, the vehicles have a car-like ride to go with their utility capabilities. In Indiana, their use falls more to a daily commute rather than tracking the wild beasts. Occupants are coddled amidst the trapping of leather, burled walnut trim and a plethora of comfort and convenience accessories.

Both the 4.0 and the performance-oriented 4.6 have no trouble qualifying for a luxury category. The MSRP (manufacturer’s suggested retail price) for the 4.0 is $55,500. For the 4.6, it’s $63,000. Add to those figures $625 for freight.

In return, you get a lot of vehicle.

It’s about as strong as a bridge and features a fully boxed and welded frame with an internal “Z” reinforcement that provides a rigid base. A Class III tow-hitch receiver is integrated with the frame. Ten tuned body mounts isolate noise and vibration from the passenger compartment.

Front and rear axles for the four-wheel drive system are full-floating live (solid housing) axles for maximum strength. This is the basic axle structure of a truck, but the car-like ride is achieved via an electronic air suspension system with air springs, tuned shock absorbers and height sensors at each wheel.

The air suspension provides 5.2 inches of travel over five height modes. There is an access mode for ease of entrance and exit, a low profile for highway cruising, standard ride height, high profile for the trail and an extended profile when the vehicle automatically senses the need for high centering.

Obviously, if you drive the sport utes across a gully, it’s not going to ride as if it’s going down North Meridian Street – on second thought, there isn’t be too much difference – but the air system is designed to smooth out the bumps and vibrations of normal travel.

Power is by state-of-the-art aluminum alloy V-8s that utilize a push rod/rocker arm valve train. Horsepower and torque figures follow known parameters, with the larger 4.6-liter engine putting out more power than the 4.0-liter motor.

The 4.6 possesses 278-cubic inches of displacement and produces a healthy 235-horsepower and 280 foot-pounds of torque. The 241-cubic inch 4.0 comes in at 190-horsepower and 236 foot-pounds of torque.

Both engines are real stump pullers, being rated at 7,700 pounds of towing capacity in the low range, 6,500 pounds in the high range.

The only transmission offered is a ZF four-speed automatic, with its electronically controlled high/low gear ratio range selected by a single tr ansmission lever.

An interesting design feature is a transfer case for the four-wheel drive system has an emergency/parking brake drum mounted on its side. In this location, the drum will not fill with mud and debris as wheel mounted drums do.

Despite the differences in engine size, there is a miniscule difference in fuel consumption. The bigger engine takes more, of course, but only by 1 mile per gallon.

The 4.0 is rated at 13 mpg city/17 highway. For the 4.6, its 12/16.

Admittedly, the 4.6 is a high buck proposition, but in addition to a bigger engine, it rides on bigger wheels that sharpen the off-road response.

The wheels are 18-inch “Mondial” design alloys that have a rim width of 8 inches, compared to a 16-inch wheel for the 4.0 SE. These 18-inchers can churn up a monstrous amount mud whether goings through bottom lands or up the side of the mountain.

I guess you could say the Range Rover 4.6 HSE and Range Rover SE are quintessential sport-utilityvehicles that o ffer image as well as utilitarian practicality. They also provide a new philosophy to the sport ute market.

Factory warranties

Basic
3 years / 42,000 miles
Corrosion
6 years

Compare similar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 1997
    2.6
    Land Rover Range Rover
    Starts at
    $55,500
    13 City / 17 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 1993
    4.9
    Honda Civic
    Starts at
    $8,950
    -
    MPG
    -
    Seat capacity
    -
    Engine
    -
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 1999
    4.9
    Toyota Land Cruiser
    Starts at
    $46,618
    13 City / 16 Hwy
    MPG
    8
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2009
    4.7
    Land Rover LR3
    Starts at
    $45,975
    12 City / 17 Hwy
    MPG
    7
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    All-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 1993
    4.0
    Volkswagen Jetta
    Starts at
    $12,800
    -
    MPG
    -
    Seat capacity
    -
    Engine
    -
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2000
    4.0
    Land Rover Range Rover
    Starts at
    $58,300
    13 City / 17 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

2.6 / 5
Based on 5 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.0
Interior 3.1
Performance 2.2
Value 2.2
Exterior 2.6
Reliability 2.0

Most recent

NOT WORTH IT

this car is a money pit. if you have 20,000 dollars to spend for a car only worth 5,000 then go for it. my car had only 80,000 miles on it, head-gasget broke, 12 mpg, bad brakes, no abs,and leaked inside.... please dont do it. not worth it
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Does not recommend this car
Comfort 4.0
Interior 2.0
Performance 1.0
Value 1.0
Exterior 2.0
Reliability 1.0
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Review for Land Rover

car has normal miles price is to expencive compare with other dealers, please reasanable pricing, we know people offer less. but you are tring to get more that more.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Transporting family
  • Does not recommend this car
Comfort 1.0
Interior 1.0
Performance 1.0
Value 1.0
Exterior 1.0
Reliability 1.0
0 people out of 0 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Land Rover dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 1997 Land Rover Range Rover?

The 1997 Land Rover Range Rover is available in 2 trim levels:

  • HSE (1 style)
  • SE (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 1997 Land Rover Range Rover?

The 1997 Land Rover Range Rover offers up to 13 MPG in city driving and 17 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 1997 Land Rover Range Rover?

The 1997 Land Rover Range Rover compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 1997 Land Rover Range Rover reliable?

The 1997 Land Rover Range Rover has an average reliability rating of 2.0 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 1997 Land Rover Range Rover owners.

Is the 1997 Land Rover Range Rover a good SUV?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 1997 Land Rover Range Rover. 40.0% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

2.6 / 5
Based on 5 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.0
  • Interior: 3.1
  • Performance: 2.2
  • Value: 2.2
  • Exterior: 2.6
  • Reliability: 2.0

Land Rover Range Rover history

Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare