2008
Land Rover LR3

Starts at:
$54,025
Shop options
New 2008 Land Rover LR3
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 4WD 4dr SE
    Starts at
    $48,525
    12 City / 17 Hwy
    MPG
    7
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 4WD 4dr HSE
    Starts at
    $54,025
    12 City / 17 Hwy
    MPG
    7
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

Photo & video gallery

2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3 2008 Land Rover LR3

Notable features

300-hp V-8 is only available engine
Fully independent suspension
Six-speed automatic
Permanent 4WD
Seating for seven

The good & the bad

The good

Offroad capability
Terrain Response technology
Land Rover heritage
Refined V-8 powertrain
Seat comfort and support

The bad

Complex, hard-to-identify controls
Third-row seat difficult to reach for folding
Fuel economy
Difficult access to front of cargo area

Expert 2008 Land Rover LR3 review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By Warren Brown
Full article
our expert's take


If the Land Rover sitting in my driveway were a job applicant, it would remain unemployed. It’s a full-size 2008 LR3 V-8 HSE sport-utility vehicle. It’s over-qualified for any job I have to do, any trip I’m planning to make.

There was a time when that would not have bothered me. I lived for automotive excess. I believed that no car or truck could be over-engineered.

That was before fuel prices went whacko and bank credit disappeared — back when there seemed to be some point to driving a top-end sport-utility vehicle in thick city traffic. But nowadays, motoring through the urban landscape in something like the LR3 V-8 HSE seems more over-the-top than anything else — the equivalent of gearing up for an off-road safari in a shopping center parking lot. The equipment is nice. Its use in a daily commuting environment doesn’t make sense.

It is a case of marketing gone awry, of a vehicle originally designed for one thing being sold and used as something else — an off-road marauder posing as a luxury statement.

The first Land Rover was introduced in 1948 as a special-purpose vehicle designed to be used much in the manner of the famed U.S. military Jeep of World War II. It was utilitarian, not fancy. It thus became the transport of choice in Africa and other regions where super-rugged, versatile vehicles were in demand.

But the business case for such a vehicle in an increasingly urbane and urban world, which is where it tends to be affordable, is rather small, much as it is for America’s Hummer, a Land Rover rival.

Both the Hummer — the comparable Hummer H2 — and the LR3 V-8 HSE are wonderfully competent in the rough. But neither makes much sense where they are commonly bought and used today — in the wilds of urban and suburban communities in wealthy, developed nations.

Consider: After driving the LR3 V-8 HSE for a week, I found little reason to use any of its sophisticated technology, such as its terrain response system, which employs a dial to electronically adjust suspension and traction settings for different road surfaces and conditions — grass, gravel, snow, mud, ruts, sand and rocks.

I started praying for snow, looking for grass and gravel surfaces, and hunting for rocky roads just to play with the terrain response system, which worked quite well. But viewed from another perspective, I wasted a lot of time and fuel searching for roads and driving surfaces that I normally would not have traveled — certainly would not have looked for — had I been behind the wheel of something other than a LR3 V-8 HSE.

But Land Rover’s marketers contend that is the point. The LR3 V-8 HSE and other Land Rover vehicles are designed to encourage adventure, they say.

It’s arguable.

Certainly, a model such as the super-rugged, extremely utilitarian Land Rover Defender, currently not on sale in the United States, is expressly designed for rough trekking. But the models sold in this country, such as the LR3 V-8 HSE and its upper crust Range Rover siblings, are designed more for the idea of going off-road than they are for actually making the trip.

That is not to disparage their competence in an off-road environment. They are every bit as up-to-snuff as the Defender in that regimen. But U.S. models tend to be plush, tufted darlings dressed with pretty exterior paint that no one wants to scratch. No one wants to damage or ruin the fine woods, or the piano-black lacquer finishes of their interiors. The idea of plopping dirty or wet bottoms on one of their supple leather seats is abominable.

In short, the luxury LR3 V-8 HSE is perfectly capable of fording streams, crawling through mud, creeping down hills and climbing rocks. But who in his or her right mind would place it in that kind of jeopardy?

Thus, as constituted, it is the moral equivalent of a museum piece. It is a driveway prince, a garage queen, an over-competent, underused, motorized bauble. Add to that the vehicle’s size, unnecessarily complicated navigation system and its appetite for premium gasoline — 12 miles per gallon in the city, 17 mpg highway — and you get what I got, a vehicle that spends more time in the driveway than it does on the road.

ON WHEELS WITH WARREN BROWN Listen from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesdays on WMET World Radio (1160 AM) or http://www.wmet1160.com.

2008 Land Rover LR3 review: Our expert's take
By Warren Brown


If the Land Rover sitting in my driveway were a job applicant, it would remain unemployed. It’s a full-size 2008 LR3 V-8 HSE sport-utility vehicle. It’s over-qualified for any job I have to do, any trip I’m planning to make.

There was a time when that would not have bothered me. I lived for automotive excess. I believed that no car or truck could be over-engineered.

That was before fuel prices went whacko and bank credit disappeared — back when there seemed to be some point to driving a top-end sport-utility vehicle in thick city traffic. But nowadays, motoring through the urban landscape in something like the LR3 V-8 HSE seems more over-the-top than anything else — the equivalent of gearing up for an off-road safari in a shopping center parking lot. The equipment is nice. Its use in a daily commuting environment doesn’t make sense.

It is a case of marketing gone awry, of a vehicle originally designed for one thing being sold and used as something else — an off-road marauder posing as a luxury statement.

The first Land Rover was introduced in 1948 as a special-purpose vehicle designed to be used much in the manner of the famed U.S. military Jeep of World War II. It was utilitarian, not fancy. It thus became the transport of choice in Africa and other regions where super-rugged, versatile vehicles were in demand.

But the business case for such a vehicle in an increasingly urbane and urban world, which is where it tends to be affordable, is rather small, much as it is for America’s Hummer, a Land Rover rival.

Both the Hummer — the comparable Hummer H2 — and the LR3 V-8 HSE are wonderfully competent in the rough. But neither makes much sense where they are commonly bought and used today — in the wilds of urban and suburban communities in wealthy, developed nations.

Consider: After driving the LR3 V-8 HSE for a week, I found little reason to use any of its sophisticated technology, such as its terrain response system, which employs a dial to electronically adjust suspension and traction settings for different road surfaces and conditions — grass, gravel, snow, mud, ruts, sand and rocks.

I started praying for snow, looking for grass and gravel surfaces, and hunting for rocky roads just to play with the terrain response system, which worked quite well. But viewed from another perspective, I wasted a lot of time and fuel searching for roads and driving surfaces that I normally would not have traveled — certainly would not have looked for — had I been behind the wheel of something other than a LR3 V-8 HSE.

But Land Rover’s marketers contend that is the point. The LR3 V-8 HSE and other Land Rover vehicles are designed to encourage adventure, they say.

It’s arguable.

Certainly, a model such as the super-rugged, extremely utilitarian Land Rover Defender, currently not on sale in the United States, is expressly designed for rough trekking. But the models sold in this country, such as the LR3 V-8 HSE and its upper crust Range Rover siblings, are designed more for the idea of going off-road than they are for actually making the trip.

That is not to disparage their competence in an off-road environment. They are every bit as up-to-snuff as the Defender in that regimen. But U.S. models tend to be plush, tufted darlings dressed with pretty exterior paint that no one wants to scratch. No one wants to damage or ruin the fine woods, or the piano-black lacquer finishes of their interiors. The idea of plopping dirty or wet bottoms on one of their supple leather seats is abominable.

In short, the luxury LR3 V-8 HSE is perfectly capable of fording streams, crawling through mud, creeping down hills and climbing rocks. But who in his or her right mind would place it in that kind of jeopardy?

Thus, as constituted, it is the moral equivalent of a museum piece. It is a driveway prince, a garage queen, an over-competent, underused, motorized bauble. Add to that the vehicle’s size, unnecessarily complicated navigation system and its appetite for premium gasoline — 12 miles per gallon in the city, 17 mpg highway — and you get what I got, a vehicle that spends more time in the driveway than it does on the road.

ON WHEELS WITH WARREN BROWN Listen from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesdays on WMET World Radio (1160 AM) or http://www.wmet1160.com.

Factory warranties

Basic
4 years / 50,000 miles
Corrosion
6 years
Powertrain
4 years / 50,000 miles
Roadside Assistance
4 years / 50,000 miles

Compare similar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 2008
    4.7
    Land Rover LR3
    Starts at
    $48,525
    12 City / 17 Hwy
    MPG
    7
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Four-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 1996
    4.6
    Land Rover Range Rover
    Starts at
    $55,000
    -
    MPG
    -
    Seat capacity
    -
    Engine
    Four-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2003
    Jaguar XJ
    Starts at
    $59,330
    17 City / 24 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2015
    4.2
    BMW 640
    Starts at
    $76,100
    21 City / 32 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-6
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2014
    5.0
    Land Rover LR4
    Starts at
    $49,700
    14 City / 19 Hwy
    MPG
    7
    Seat capacity
    Intercooled Supercharger Premium Unleaded V-6
    Engine
    Four-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2009
    4.7
    Land Rover LR3
    Starts at
    $45,975
    12 City / 17 Hwy
    MPG
    7
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    All-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

4.7 / 5
Based on 34 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 4.9
Interior 4.7
Performance 4.6
Value 4.4
Exterior 4.7
Reliability 4.4

Most recent

Dream. Ehicle

Great vehicle. 2008 is the first year that Ford placed a V-8 Jaguar engine in this heavy body. Awesome performance and package. Very comfortable and I always get compliments. LR4 has a beautiful upgraded interior but the exterior stays the same in 2010 essentially. Fun to drive.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 5.0
Interior 5.0
Performance 5.0
Value 3.0
Exterior 4.0
Reliability 4.0
8 people out of 9 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Super civilized and inexpensive to own.

Now that LR3's have come down in price there is no better SUV out their for the money ( my humble opinion) Don't be afraid of these but stay away from the old Discoveries.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Commuting
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 5.0
Interior 4.0
Performance 5.0
Value 4.0
Exterior 3.0
Reliability 4.0
10 people out of 10 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Land Rover dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 2008 Land Rover LR3?

The 2008 Land Rover LR3 is available in 2 trim levels:

  • HSE (1 style)
  • SE (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 2008 Land Rover LR3?

The 2008 Land Rover LR3 offers up to 12 MPG in city driving and 17 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 2008 Land Rover LR3?

The 2008 Land Rover LR3 compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 2008 Land Rover LR3 reliable?

The 2008 Land Rover LR3 has an average reliability rating of 4.4 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 2008 Land Rover LR3 owners.

Is the 2008 Land Rover LR3 a good SUV?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 2008 Land Rover LR3. 97.1% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.7 / 5
Based on 34 reviews
  • Comfort: 4.9
  • Interior: 4.7
  • Performance: 4.6
  • Value: 4.4
  • Exterior: 4.7
  • Reliability: 4.4
Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare