1992
Ford Ranger

Starts at:
$11,461
Shop options
New 1992 Ford Ranger
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • Sport Styleside 108" WB
    Starts at
    $8,730
    See all specs
  • "S" Styleside 108" WB
    Starts at
    $8,730
    See all specs
  • Sport Styleside 114" WB
    Starts at
    $8,887
    See all specs
  • Styleside 108" WB
    Starts at
    $9,876
    See all specs
  • Styleside 114" WB
    Starts at
    $10,196
    See all specs
  • Supercab Styleside 125" WB
    Starts at
    $11,461
    See all specs
  • Sport Styleside 108" WB 4WD
    Starts at
    $12,418
    See all specs
  • "S" Styleside 108" WB 4WD
    Starts at
    $12,418
    See all specs
  • Sport Styleside 114" WB 4WD
    Starts at
    $12,574
    See all specs
  • Styleside 108" WB 4WD
    Starts at
    $13,345
    See all specs
  • Styleside 114" WB 4WD
    Starts at
    $13,556
    See all specs
  • Supercab Styleside 125" WB 4WD
    Starts at
    $14,840
    See all specs

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 1992 Ford Ranger review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By Jim Mateja
Full article
our expert's take

The Ford Ranger is the best-selling compact pickup in the market.

Though the base engine in the Ranger is only a 2.3-liter, 100-h.p. 4-cylinder teamed with 5-speed manual, you can move up to the much peppier 4-liter, 160-h.p. V-6 teamed with 4-speed automatic.

The twin I-beam suspension allows you to throw heavy cargo in the rearbed, while at the same time not bouncing you all over the highway when there`sonly one passenger in the cabin. Complementing the suspension are all-season15-inch steel-belted radial tires and standard rear-wheel anti-lock brakes.

Four-wheel drive eliminates most of the fears of Snow Belt driving. Andif you opt to go off road, no problem. The beauty of the system is that youengage it by pressing a button marked “4×4“ on the dash. If the snow is verydeep or the mud or sand beneath very gooey, you press “4×4 low“ to maneuver.

We tested the Ranger 4×4 in SuperCab version, meaning there are a coupleof jump seats in back of the driver and passenger chairs. Little kids can sit inside with Ma and Pa and don`t have to be tossed in the rear bed with thegroceries. With those two seats, you also can store a few packages ofgroceries in the cabin to protect them from the elements.

The Ranger has a lot to offer. It`s the No. 1-selling compact pickuptruck. But that shouldn`t stop Ford from making some needed changes this fall,when the restyled 1993 replacement appears.

What Ranger needs is to be more user-friendly. Why mess with success when you`re No. 1? So you don`t slip to No. 2.

When it comes to changes, we`d like to see a driver-side air bag. Rear-wheel ABS is standard; four-wheel ABS wouldn`t hurt.

Next, take whoever invented the stiff bladder-filled seats with pull-outthigh support extension and have him flogged. If a woman did it, flog her.This is an equal punishment column.

Even without the needless thigh support extension, the seat`s forward/backward control lever is buried so far down and under the seat you have tostand on your head to reach it. Why so much effort to design discomfort?

While the whip is still warm, someone also should check out who chose togo artsy instead of practical with the outside rearview mirrors. Both are cut at an awkward angle, which makes them difficult to adjust and troublesome tosee.

The 1992 Ranger 4×4 SuperCab we tested started at $14,840. Optionsincluded the 4-liter V-6 at $179, the 4-speed automatic at a gut-wrenching$954, air conditioning at $755, power windows and locks at $367, a slidingrear window that dramatically contributes to ventilation at $113, limited slipdifferential at $238, and a preferred equipment package at $2,428, consisting of STX trim, electronically controlled AM/FM stereo with cassette and clock,speed control, tilt steering wheel and rear jump seats. A sport appearancepackage that goes unexplained on the window sticker ran $879.

1992 Ford Ranger review: Our expert's take
By Jim Mateja

The Ford Ranger is the best-selling compact pickup in the market.

Though the base engine in the Ranger is only a 2.3-liter, 100-h.p. 4-cylinder teamed with 5-speed manual, you can move up to the much peppier 4-liter, 160-h.p. V-6 teamed with 4-speed automatic.

The twin I-beam suspension allows you to throw heavy cargo in the rearbed, while at the same time not bouncing you all over the highway when there`sonly one passenger in the cabin. Complementing the suspension are all-season15-inch steel-belted radial tires and standard rear-wheel anti-lock brakes.

Four-wheel drive eliminates most of the fears of Snow Belt driving. Andif you opt to go off road, no problem. The beauty of the system is that youengage it by pressing a button marked “4×4“ on the dash. If the snow is verydeep or the mud or sand beneath very gooey, you press “4×4 low“ to maneuver.

We tested the Ranger 4×4 in SuperCab version, meaning there are a coupleof jump seats in back of the driver and passenger chairs. Little kids can sit inside with Ma and Pa and don`t have to be tossed in the rear bed with thegroceries. With those two seats, you also can store a few packages ofgroceries in the cabin to protect them from the elements.

The Ranger has a lot to offer. It`s the No. 1-selling compact pickuptruck. But that shouldn`t stop Ford from making some needed changes this fall,when the restyled 1993 replacement appears.

What Ranger needs is to be more user-friendly. Why mess with success when you`re No. 1? So you don`t slip to No. 2.

When it comes to changes, we`d like to see a driver-side air bag. Rear-wheel ABS is standard; four-wheel ABS wouldn`t hurt.

Next, take whoever invented the stiff bladder-filled seats with pull-outthigh support extension and have him flogged. If a woman did it, flog her.This is an equal punishment column.

Even without the needless thigh support extension, the seat`s forward/backward control lever is buried so far down and under the seat you have tostand on your head to reach it. Why so much effort to design discomfort?

While the whip is still warm, someone also should check out who chose togo artsy instead of practical with the outside rearview mirrors. Both are cut at an awkward angle, which makes them difficult to adjust and troublesome tosee.

The 1992 Ranger 4×4 SuperCab we tested started at $14,840. Optionsincluded the 4-liter V-6 at $179, the 4-speed automatic at a gut-wrenching$954, air conditioning at $755, power windows and locks at $367, a slidingrear window that dramatically contributes to ventilation at $113, limited slipdifferential at $238, and a preferred equipment package at $2,428, consisting of STX trim, electronically controlled AM/FM stereo with cassette and clock,speed control, tilt steering wheel and rear jump seats. A sport appearancepackage that goes unexplained on the window sticker ran $879.

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
Fords and many non-Ford vehicles up to 10 years old with less than 150,000 miles
Basic
90-Day / 4,000-Mile (whichever comes first) Comprehensive Limited Warranty
Dealer certification
139-point inspection

Compare similar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 1992
    4.1
    Ford Ranger
    Starts at
    $8,730
    -
    MPG
    -
    Seat capacity
    -
    Engine
    -
    Drivetrain
    -
    Payload Capacity
    -
    Towing Capacity
    Compare
  • 2006
    4.6
    Subaru Baja
    Starts at
    $22,495
    23 City / 28 Hwy
    MPG
    4
    Seat capacity
    Turbo Gas 4-Cyl
    Engine
    All-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    -
    Payload Capacity
    -
    Towing Capacity
    Compare
  • 1997
    4.4
    Dodge Dakota
    Starts at
    $12,725
    16 City / 21 Hwy
    MPG
    3
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    1,478 lbs
    Payload Capacity
    N/A
    Towing Capacity
    Compare
  • 1993
    3.9
    Ford Ranger
    Starts at
    $8,781
    -
    MPG
    -
    Seat capacity
    -
    Engine
    -
    Drivetrain
    -
    Payload Capacity
    -
    Towing Capacity
    Compare
  • 2001
    4.6
    Chevrolet S-10
    Starts at
    $12,849
    19 City / 25 Hwy
    MPG
    3
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    1,148 lbs
    Payload Capacity
    N/A
    Towing Capacity
    Compare
  • 2002
    4.4
    Ford Explorer Sport Trac
    Starts at
    $22,255
    17 City / 21 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Rear-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    1,517 lbs
    Payload Capacity
    N/A
    Towing Capacity
    Compare
  • Compare more options
    Use our comparison tool to add any vehicle of your choice and see a full list of specifications and features side-by-side.
    Try it now

Consumer reviews

4.1 / 5
Based on 6 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 3.4
Interior 3.5
Performance 4.2
Value 4.8
Exterior 3.8
Reliability 4.9

Most recent

Better than earlier rangers ...

Safety and performance were better than the 86 Ranger I owned prior. The hi-back seats were better than having my head but the back window if rear ended. The 3.0 v6 is far better than 2.9 v6 in my experience. Overall I think it is a good vehicle for how I use it.
  • Purchased a New car
  • Used for Having fun
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 3.0
Interior 3.0
Performance 4.0
Value 5.0
Exterior 4.0
Reliability 5.0
3 people out of 3 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Has been my baby, well cared for.

good solid truck, will be working years from now.I am disabled and can no longer drive the truck. With its low milage I think the new owner will be very happy with it.
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Having fun
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 4.0
Interior 4.0
Performance 5.0
Value 5.0
Exterior 5.0
Reliability 5.0
4 people out of 4 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Ford dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 1992 Ford Ranger?

The 1992 Ford Ranger is available in 2 trim levels:

  • (10 styles)
  • "S" (2 styles)

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 1992 Ford Ranger?

The 1992 Ford Ranger compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 1992 Ford Ranger reliable?

The 1992 Ford Ranger has an average reliability rating of 4.9 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 1992 Ford Ranger owners.

Is the 1992 Ford Ranger a good Truck?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 1992 Ford Ranger. 100.0% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

4.1 / 5
Based on 6 reviews
  • Comfort: 3.4
  • Interior: 3.5
  • Performance: 4.2
  • Value: 4.8
  • Exterior: 3.8
  • Reliability: 4.9

Ford Ranger history

Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare