1996
Chevrolet Monte Carlo

Starts at:
$19,455
Shop options
New 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
See ratings
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Consumer rating
Owner reviewed vehicle score
Not rated
Safety rating
NHTSA tested vehicle score
Shop Cars.com
Browse cars & save your favorites
Dealers near you
Find & contact a dealership near you
no listings

We're not finding any listings in your area.
Change your location or search Cars.com to see more!

Change location

Available trims

See the differences side-by-side to compare trims.
  • 2dr Cpe LS
    Starts at
    $17,255
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs
  • 2dr Cpe Z34
    Starts at
    $19,455
    17 City / 26 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Front Wheel Drive
    Drivetrain
    See all specs

The good & the bad

This vehicle doesn't have any good or bad insights yet.

Use our comparison tool to look at this model side-by-side with other vehicles or view the full specifications list .

Start your comparison

Expert 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo review

our expert's take
Our expert's take
By
Full article
our expert's take

The Monte Carlo name holds a special place in the hearts of Chevy loyalists.

The last time a car had this name gracing its flanks, Bill Clinton thought Whitewater was a good investment. With its knife-edge styling, opera window and rear-drive V-8 performance, this was an all-American styling statement. It was big, space-inefficient and loved by Chevy devotees, who would buy any car as long as it was called a Monte Carlo. The name was enough for people to order the car sight unseen when it first came out.

So, does today’s version live up to its legendary reputation? Does its styling go for baroque, as the Monte always has done?

Well, in this age of computer-designed efficiency, there are no more opera windows (just a fixed rear window), V-8 power (only V-6s), or rear-wheel drive (front-wheel only). The Monte Carlo for 1996 is basically a two-door Lumina, except it goes wild with a rather thick rear C-pillar. The overall shape is very aerodynamic (better for the NASCAR Winston Cup series), yet distinctly American.

The same could be said for the interior. Despite the influence of European design on the dash, the seats (a 60-40 split bench seat with storage armrest) lacked support for the type of driving a Monte Carlo driver would most likely do. Spring for the optional bucket seats — they should be more comfortable. The rear seats have decent space for a coupe, despite the fact they’re rather low. But then, this is a coupe. If you want comfortable rear seats, buy a sedan. Leather seating surfaces are an option on both the base LS and sportier Z34.

Control layout is much better than any Lumina coupe could ever hope to be. The dash now features dual airbags and incorporates one of Chevy’s best designs in years. Two big, simple knobs constitute the climate controls and are easy to use and understand. Along with them are two sliders, one for each front-seat passenger, to adjust the temperature to their own needs. The radio also features two knobs, but duplicate steering-wheel controls render them redundant. Particularly useful is the mute button, which turns the sound off momentarily when you pull up to a toll booth or ask for directions.

Rear-seat heating ducts, theater lighting, adjustable intermittent windshield wipers, tilt steering wheel, dual electric sideview mirrors, cup holders and trunk-mounted cargo net are all conveniences standard in the LS. The 15.7-cubic-foot trunk was well-shaped, with a low liftover.

Another nice touch is the petrochemical wood that permeates the interior. It’s obviously fake, but warms what would otherwise be a cold interior. The quality of the materials is better than last year. The overall effect is much more impressive than previously and more competitive with its rivals.

Noise levels are lower, with big reductions in wind and engine noises — not world class, but still quite good. Thank sandwich steel construction, thicker glass and other measures to help keep the racket down.

OK, so it’s comfy. How does it go? No doubt very fast with the optional 3.4-liter double overhead cam V-6. With the standard 3.1-liter, it’s decent for most occasions. Although not blindingly fast, the 160 horsepower plant moves this 3,306-pound car with some authority. Just don’t challenge any Mustang GTs. There’s some noise when pushed, but it isn’t objectionable.

The electronic four-speed automatic transmission sends out the shifts quicker than Steve Forbes can say “flat tax.”

The suspension is independent at all four corners. The ride was rather typical for a mid-size GM car. It tends to lean towards the spongy end of the spectrum, but sharp impacts are still felt. Push the base car through a corner hard and you’ll feel some understeer and plowing. It’s a safe, but not sporty, set-up.

Front disc, rear drum anti-lock brakes are standard on the LS. Jump up to the Z34 and you get four-wheel discs. Braking wasu eventful, but if it ever becomes eventful, this car doe s meet 1997 side impact standards.

Introduced in 1970, and featuring a 454-cubic-inch, 360 horsepower V-8, the Monte Carlo certainly has a performance heritage. Its place in NASCAR history is assured.

But this Monte Carlo, especially in the LS version tested, leans more toward the second generation in spirit. When introduced in 1973, options like the Landau package and Colannade package proved that style and comfort were as important as speed. For those who like a fine suit of clothes, this will do just fine. But for those to whom NASCAR is the true meaning of life, only a Z34 will do.

1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo review: Our expert's take
By

The Monte Carlo name holds a special place in the hearts of Chevy loyalists.

The last time a car had this name gracing its flanks, Bill Clinton thought Whitewater was a good investment. With its knife-edge styling, opera window and rear-drive V-8 performance, this was an all-American styling statement. It was big, space-inefficient and loved by Chevy devotees, who would buy any car as long as it was called a Monte Carlo. The name was enough for people to order the car sight unseen when it first came out.

So, does today’s version live up to its legendary reputation? Does its styling go for baroque, as the Monte always has done?

Well, in this age of computer-designed efficiency, there are no more opera windows (just a fixed rear window), V-8 power (only V-6s), or rear-wheel drive (front-wheel only). The Monte Carlo for 1996 is basically a two-door Lumina, except it goes wild with a rather thick rear C-pillar. The overall shape is very aerodynamic (better for the NASCAR Winston Cup series), yet distinctly American.

The same could be said for the interior. Despite the influence of European design on the dash, the seats (a 60-40 split bench seat with storage armrest) lacked support for the type of driving a Monte Carlo driver would most likely do. Spring for the optional bucket seats — they should be more comfortable. The rear seats have decent space for a coupe, despite the fact they’re rather low. But then, this is a coupe. If you want comfortable rear seats, buy a sedan. Leather seating surfaces are an option on both the base LS and sportier Z34.

Control layout is much better than any Lumina coupe could ever hope to be. The dash now features dual airbags and incorporates one of Chevy’s best designs in years. Two big, simple knobs constitute the climate controls and are easy to use and understand. Along with them are two sliders, one for each front-seat passenger, to adjust the temperature to their own needs. The radio also features two knobs, but duplicate steering-wheel controls render them redundant. Particularly useful is the mute button, which turns the sound off momentarily when you pull up to a toll booth or ask for directions.

Rear-seat heating ducts, theater lighting, adjustable intermittent windshield wipers, tilt steering wheel, dual electric sideview mirrors, cup holders and trunk-mounted cargo net are all conveniences standard in the LS. The 15.7-cubic-foot trunk was well-shaped, with a low liftover.

Another nice touch is the petrochemical wood that permeates the interior. It’s obviously fake, but warms what would otherwise be a cold interior. The quality of the materials is better than last year. The overall effect is much more impressive than previously and more competitive with its rivals.

Noise levels are lower, with big reductions in wind and engine noises — not world class, but still quite good. Thank sandwich steel construction, thicker glass and other measures to help keep the racket down.

OK, so it’s comfy. How does it go? No doubt very fast with the optional 3.4-liter double overhead cam V-6. With the standard 3.1-liter, it’s decent for most occasions. Although not blindingly fast, the 160 horsepower plant moves this 3,306-pound car with some authority. Just don’t challenge any Mustang GTs. There’s some noise when pushed, but it isn’t objectionable.

The electronic four-speed automatic transmission sends out the shifts quicker than Steve Forbes can say “flat tax.”

The suspension is independent at all four corners. The ride was rather typical for a mid-size GM car. It tends to lean towards the spongy end of the spectrum, but sharp impacts are still felt. Push the base car through a corner hard and you’ll feel some understeer and plowing. It’s a safe, but not sporty, set-up.

Front disc, rear drum anti-lock brakes are standard on the LS. Jump up to the Z34 and you get four-wheel discs. Braking wasu eventful, but if it ever becomes eventful, this car doe s meet 1997 side impact standards.

Introduced in 1970, and featuring a 454-cubic-inch, 360 horsepower V-8, the Monte Carlo certainly has a performance heritage. Its place in NASCAR history is assured.

But this Monte Carlo, especially in the LS version tested, leans more toward the second generation in spirit. When introduced in 1973, options like the Landau package and Colannade package proved that style and comfort were as important as speed. For those who like a fine suit of clothes, this will do just fine. But for those to whom NASCAR is the true meaning of life, only a Z34 will do.

Certified Pre-Owned program benefits

Age / mileage
5 model years or newer / up to 75,000 miles
Basic
12 months / 12,000 miles bumper-to-bumper original warranty, then may continue to 6 years / 100,000 miles limited (depending on variables)
Dealer certification
172-point inspection

Compare similar vehicles

Select cars to compare for more detailed info.
  • 1996
    3.4
    Chevrolet Monte Carlo
    Starts at
    $17,255
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    -
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 1999
    4.4
    Chevrolet Monte Carlo
    Starts at
    $18,615
    20 City / 29 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V6
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare
  • 2007
    4.5
    Pontiac Grand Prix
    Starts at
    $21,815
    20 City / 30 Hwy
    MPG
    5
    Seat capacity
    Gas V8
    Engine
    Front-wheel drive
    Drivetrain
    Compare

Consumer reviews

3.4 / 5
Based on 4 reviews
Write a review
Comfort 3.9
Interior 4.0
Performance 3.7
Value 3.9
Exterior 3.8
Reliability 3.7

Most recent

The 2nd WORST car I've ever owned!

Bought this car from a friend - it's the Z34 model - who takes immaculate care of their vehicles so I figured it was a safe bet - boy was I wrong! Within the first 2 months the valve gasket started to leak and fouled the plugs, well that was $400.00 to fix and I didn't have the car for over a week. In the next month, the windshield wipers stopped working - was it the wiper motor or the relay switch? Well it cost another $400.00 to figure out it was neither, there was a short in the wire! In the meantime, the lever that controls where your heat or ac blows from stuck on defrost and floor - not even going there to figure out how to fix that! Now my driver side window is stuck down and it's 50 degrees outside and getting colder! This car is a money pit!!
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Does not recommend this car
Comfort 3.0
Interior 3.0
Performance 1.0
Value 1.0
Exterior 3.0
Reliability 1.0
1 person out of 3 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

most reliable

i have the same car, very reliable. mpg in the city, very good for a v6. i had mine for 6 years. still have it now. for that cost, ill get it
  • Purchased a Used car
  • Used for Having fun
  • Does recommend this car
Comfort 4.0
Interior 4.0
Performance 5.0
Value 5.0
Exterior 4.0
Reliability 5.0
1 person out of 1 found this review helpful. Did you?
Yes No

Latest news from cars.com

See all news

Chevrolet dealers near you

FAQ

What trim levels are available for the 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo?

The 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is available in 2 trim levels:

  • LS (1 style)
  • Z34 (1 style)

What is the MPG of the 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo?

The 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo offers up to 20 MPG in city driving and 29 MPG on the highway. These figures are based on EPA mileage ratings and are for comparison purposes only. The actual mileage will vary depending on vehicle options, trim level, driving conditions, driving habits, vehicle maintenance, and other factors.

What are some similar vehicles and competitors of the 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo?

The 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo compares to and/or competes against the following vehicles:

Is the 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo reliable?

The 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo has an average reliability rating of 3.7 out of 5 according to cars.com consumers. Find real-world reliability insights within consumer reviews from 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo owners.

Is the 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo a good Coupe?

Below are the cars.com consumers ratings for the 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. 75.0% of drivers recommend this vehicle.

3.4 / 5
Based on 4 reviews
  • Comfort: 3.9
  • Interior: 4.0
  • Performance: 3.7
  • Value: 3.9
  • Exterior: 3.8
  • Reliability: 3.7
Your list was successfully saved.
Your comparisons
 
 
 
 
Save list Compare